Talk:MAPS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Adding to the story) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:20, 2 October 2006
Adding to the story
There was a lot missing from the initial article. The omission of the "domed stadium" controversy was serious. I hope my contribution preserves the neutral point of view while adding important details. I am still unhappy with the list of projects that is ranked by "popularity." The list of projects authorized in the enabling legislation was rather different. No "light rail," for instance. The Oklahoma City model also deserved a mention. -- Rob 18:20, 2 October 2006 (PDT)