Talk:Victor Hanson III: Difference between revisions

From Bhamwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Post-Herald ==
== Post-Herald ==
I could be mistaken, but beyond the joint operating agreement where ''The News'' owned the presses, I don't believe Victor Hanson III was considered the publisher of the ''Post-Herald''.  I'll double-check when I get a chance. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 15:19, 17 September 2009 (PDT)
I could be mistaken, but beyond the joint operating agreement where ''The News'' owned the presses, I don't believe Victor Hanson III was considered the publisher of the ''Post-Herald''.  I'll double-check when I get a chance. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 15:19, 17 September 2009 (PDT)
* That's possible. A few websites had his as the publisher of the P-H, but that's an easy mistake. You might know who to ask about the particulars. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 15:55, 17 September 2009 (PDT)
* That's possible. A few websites had his as the publisher of the P-H, but that's an easy mistake. You might know whom to ask about the particulars. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 15:55, 17 September 2009 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 17:55, 17 September 2009

Post-Herald

I could be mistaken, but beyond the joint operating agreement where The News owned the presses, I don't believe Victor Hanson III was considered the publisher of the Post-Herald. I'll double-check when I get a chance. --Lkseitz 15:19, 17 September 2009 (PDT)

  • That's possible. A few websites had his as the publisher of the P-H, but that's an easy mistake. You might know whom to ask about the particulars. --Dystopos 15:55, 17 September 2009 (PDT)