Talk:UAB public art: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*I would assume that the numbers come from the Table referenced, which probably included a map. Without the map as an image, the numbers are useless, so yes, a bulleted, alpha list would work better. [[User:Wheresdib|--Wheresdib]] 08:43, 4 October 2006 (PDT) | *I would assume that the numbers come from the Table referenced, which probably included a map. Without the map as an image, the numbers are useless, so yes, a bulleted, alpha list would work better. [[User:Wheresdib|--Wheresdib]] 08:43, 4 October 2006 (PDT) | ||
:* I plan on creating a new map. I think a chronological list would be more informative than an alphabetical one. (Assuming we can get the information) --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 10:01, 4 October 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:01, 4 October 2006
Order
These are in a numbered list, but I can discern no order from it. Would a bulleted, alphabetical list be more appropriate? --Lkseitz 06:46, 4 October 2006 (PDT)
- I would assume that the numbers come from the Table referenced, which probably included a map. Without the map as an image, the numbers are useless, so yes, a bulleted, alpha list would work better. --Wheresdib 08:43, 4 October 2006 (PDT)
- I plan on creating a new map. I think a chronological list would be more informative than an alphabetical one. (Assuming we can get the information) --Dystopos 10:01, 4 October 2006 (PDT)