Category talk:Birmingham Police Department: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(My two cents.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Does anyone think it a bad idea to have a list of all the divisions and task forces in the department?--[[User:Jared Johnson|Jared Johnson]] 02:01, 7 May 2012 (PDT) | *Does anyone think it a bad idea to have a list of all the divisions and task forces in the department?--[[User:Jared Johnson|Jared Johnson]] 02:01, 7 May 2012 (PDT) | ||
** I think it's a good idea for the [[Birmingham Police Department]] article, but sometimes those task forces can be short-lived. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 09:32, 7 May 2012 (PDT) | ** I think it's a good idea for the [[Birmingham Police Department]] article, but sometimes those task forces can be short-lived. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 09:32, 7 May 2012 (PDT) | ||
*** I agree the divisions should be listed in the BPD article, but task forces should probably be a separate, list-style article. And if the task force is short-lived enough, it perhaps shouldn't even be a link. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 10:06, 7 May 2012 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:06, 7 May 2012
Divisions
- Does anyone think it a bad idea to have a list of all the divisions and task forces in the department?--Jared Johnson 02:01, 7 May 2012 (PDT)
- I think it's a good idea for the Birmingham Police Department article, but sometimes those task forces can be short-lived. --Dystopos 09:32, 7 May 2012 (PDT)
- I agree the divisions should be listed in the BPD article, but task forces should probably be a separate, list-style article. And if the task force is short-lived enough, it perhaps shouldn't even be a link. --Lkseitz 10:06, 7 May 2012 (PDT)
- I think it's a good idea for the Birmingham Police Department article, but sometimes those task forces can be short-lived. --Dystopos 09:32, 7 May 2012 (PDT)